http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/ random thoughts on programming and programming languages Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:03:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-150 Anthony Morgan Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:53:14 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-150 Very nice list. I learnt Haskell from Simon Thompson's Craft of functional programming. One other excellent resource for advanced Haskell programming, indeed the one I consider to have been most helpful in my experiance, is the wiki on haskell.org. Very nice list. I learnt Haskell from Simon Thompson’s Craft of functional programming. One other excellent resource for advanced Haskell programming, indeed the one I consider to have been most helpful in my experiance, is the wiki on haskell.org.

]]> http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-147 jao Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:23:02 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-147 Simen, that's right: Haskell is usually considered more purely functional because it does not allow side-effects (no mutable variables). When they're absolutely necessary (e.g., in input/output operations), they're hidden away inside monads. Another interesting feature separating Haskell from Lisp (although this one does not make it 'more functional') is lazy evaluation. In general, as any lisper will tell you, Lisp (and specially Common Lisp) tries hard not to impose a single paradigm (functional or any other) on you (at the cost, sometimes, of convenience: e.g. lazy evaluation is possible but a bit cumbersome). Simen, that’s right: Haskell is usually considered more purely functional because it does not allow side-effects (no mutable variables). When they’re absolutely necessary (e.g., in input/output operations), they’re hidden away inside monads. Another interesting feature separating Haskell from Lisp (although this one does not make it ‘more functional’ is lazy evaluation. In general, as any lisper will tell you, Lisp (and specially Common Lisp) tries hard not to impose a single paradigm (functional or any other) on you (at the cost, sometimes, of convenience: e.g. lazy evaluation is possible but a bit cumbersome).

]]> http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-146 Mag Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:26:07 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-146 Yes. Wow, an impressive set of links. Really. Yes. Wow, an impressive set of links. Really.

]]> http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-145 The Hobbit Hole » Scheme in Haskell Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:51:16 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-145 [...] This guy is interesting and has several good articles on programming, though I think this is my favorite so far. [...] [...] This guy is interesting and has several good articles on programming, though I think this is my favorite so far. [...]

]]> http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-144 Simen Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:43:43 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-144 I'll be sure to check out the "Write yourself a Scheme in 48 hours" tutorial. I've been playing with Scheme ( and Common Lisp ) lately, and it's great fun. If I've understood it right, Haskell is a more "pure" functional language than the various Lisps? I’ll be sure to check out the “Write yourself a Scheme in 48 hours” tutorial. I’ve been playing with Scheme ( and Common Lisp ) lately, and it’s great fun. If I’ve understood it right, Haskell is a more “pure” functional language than the various Lisps?

]]> http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-143 Mark Haniford Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:02:40 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-143 Wow, an impressive set of links. It looks like you've laid out all the resources anybody would need to dive into the Function/Haskell world. Wow, an impressive set of links. It looks like you’ve laid out all the resources anybody would need to dive into the Function/Haskell world.

]]> http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-141 make it functional » Blog Archive » Haskell: 48시간 안에 인터프리터 만들기 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:29:23 +0000 https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/#comment-141 [...] 그 외에 http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/에 소개된 책들을 읽어보는 것도 괜찮겠다. [...] [...] 그 외에 http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/a-haskell-bookshelf/에 소개된 책들을 읽어보는 것도 괜찮겠다. [...]

]]>